mallacore.Let’s talk

ENGAGEMENTS

A defined engagement.
A useful operating result.

Start with a paid Map when the priorities need clarity, or scope a pilot when the problem is already defined. Continue with implementation and support under clear agreements.

FIND YOUR STARTING POINT

Not sure where to start?

Seven questions. About two minutes. Find out whether a Map, a Build or Stewardship is a useful next conversation.

Find your next move

01 / THE MAP

Know what
is worth building.

A paid diagnostic for one defined operating problem. Bring the workflow owner to the conversation, walk us through how the work runs, and share approved examples of routine work and exceptions.

We agree what the Map will cover and what you’ll receive, then quote it in writing before you decide. Any recommended Build has its own scope and quote.

Discuss a Map

What you receive

  • A map of the current workflow and where it breaks
  • The records, systems, and permissions the work depends on
  • Ranked options, with assumptions and constraints made visible
  • A recommendation on whether to proceed, revise the plan, or stop
  • If implementation makes sense, a proposed scope, success measures, and investment

If the pilot or implementation scope is already clear, you can discuss it directly.

02 / THE BUILD

Put the right system
into the work.

Before we build one defined capability, we agree on the Pass Bar with the people who will operate it. It states what has to work, where a person reviews it, and how we’ll test it.

Discuss implementation

What the scope defines

  • The workflow or application and supported use cases
  • Source access and system integrations
  • Human review and permission boundaries
  • Test cases, a baseline, acceptance criteria, and a staged release plan
  • Training, documentation, and stabilization

Fit: a defined operating problem, an accountable decision-maker, and a team that can supply inputs and test the work. Begin with a bounded pilot when feasibility needs proving.

Download a sample acceptance plan (fictional example)

03 / STEWARDSHIP

Keep the system
useful over time.

Maintain a working system and improve it against agreed priorities. Set a regular review cadence, compare performance with agreed measures, and define responsibilities for technical support and day-to-day operation.

Discuss ongoing support

What we agree together

  • Included systems, sources, and service hours
  • Review frequency and performance measures
  • Issue response and escalation responsibilities
  • Maintenance and improvement priorities
  • Who owns the work between review cycles

Fit: a system is in use and a named owner wants ongoing maintenance or improvement. The support agreement defines capacity, coverage, review, and changes outside the included scope.

YOUR NEXT MOVE

Bring us the problem
that keeps coming back.

The report nobody trusts. The handoff that stalls. The work that still depends on one person. Start there.

Let’s talk about it